top of page

Major Record Labels Are Abusing Copyright Claims on YouTube: Here’s How Creators Can Fight Back

Updated: Aug 22


The battle over fair use on YouTube has reached a breaking point. Influential voices like Anthony Fantano and Rick Beato have been exposing how major record labels are exploiting copyright claims to siphon monetization from creators.


This is not just an occasional dispute, it is a systematic problem affecting reaction channels, educational content creators, and commentary-based entrepreneurs.


1. The Rise of Unfair YouTube Copyright Claims


Under U.S. copyright law, specifically 17 U.S.C. § 107, creators have the right to use portions of copyrighted works without permission for criticism, commentary, education, and news reporting. This is called fair use.


However, major record labels seem to have been ignoring these protections. If you post a reaction video, a breakdown of a song, or even a short clip for educational purposes, they may file a claim to seize your monetization. In some cases, they may even threaten your channel with strikes if you dispute the claim.


2. High-Profile Examples: Fantano and Rick Beato


Rick Beato’s experience: Beato has spent years educating viewers about music theory and production. Even though he plays short clips to illustrate his points, which often falls under fair use, record labels have repeatedly demonetized his videos. For years, he did not contest the claims, and the labels collected his ad revenue.


Anthony Fantano’s revelations: Fantano recently shared behind-the-scenes details about how YouTube handles these disputes. He even had a video claimed for briefly singing two words from a song in a review context. At times, Fantano has deleted hundreds of videos to avoid copyright entanglements.


Both creators have made it clear: this does not appear to be a random problem, but a coordinated strategy by labels to control online commentary and maximize their own revenue.


3. Why This Matters for Creators and Entrepreneurs


When a major record label decides your video is not “good enough” commentary, they may be able to strip your monetization. This subjective decision-making has no basis in copyright law, but most creators lack the resources to challenge it.


The result?

  • Lost revenue for creators who are entitled to keep it.

  • Suppressed content because YouTube’s algorithm deprioritizes videos under claim.

  • Discouraged commentary on new music, reducing diversity of discussion.


4. The Pay-for-Promotion Problem


Fantano also revealed that some channels avoid conflict by accepting payment from labels to promote their artists. While this may look like organic enthusiasm, it is often a marketing arrangement in disguise. This blurs the line between independent opinion and paid endorsement, making transparency even more important.


5. How Creators Can Protect Themselves


If you are a creator or business owner producing commentary, educational content, or reaction videos, you can and should fight back. Here are key steps:


  1. Document your fair use argument: Keep detailed notes on why your use qualifies under 17 U.S.C. § 107.

  2. File disputes when appropriate: Use precise legal language to assert your rights.

  3. Consult with an entertainment attorney: An experienced lawyer can help navigate the dispute process and push back against abusive claims.

  4. Avoid undisclosed sponsorships: If you are paid to feature content, disclose it to maintain credibility and comply with FTC guidelines.


6. Take Legal Action Against Abusive Claims


At Delgado Entertainment Law, we represent creators, entrepreneurs, and small business owners who face copyright abuse from major entertainment companies. We have successfully fought claims from the world’s largest record labels, restoring monetization and protecting our clients’ channels from strikes.


If you have been targeted with unfair YouTube copyright claims, you do not have to give up your revenue. Schedule a consultation today and let us defend your right to create.



bottom of page